discussvegan.

I tried and slipped up, what's the point now?

Short answer: The point survives the slip. Animals spared aren't 'given back' by one lapse, impact is cumulative, and the only failed attempt is the one you quit over.

Exhibit A
One slip vs the whole attempt

Cumulative-impact framing; ACE / EA estimates

The objection

“I went vegan, then caved and ate a cheese toastie. So I’ve blown it, I might as well go back to normal.”

The answer

You’re scoring this like a purity test. It’s a tally.

The harm of eating animals works like a running total of demand, not a switch that flips from “innocent” to “guilty”. One slipped meal adds one meal’s worth back to that total. It does not retroactively un-spare every animal your previous months spared, any more than one cigarette undoes a year of not smoking. The maths is additive, and after market elasticity is taken into account, even that single meal’s impact is partly diluted (EA Forum). Three steps forward and one back is still two steps forward.

The genuinely costly move is the conclusion you’re drawing, not the toastie. “Might as well go back” trades one bad meal for every future meal. Over a year, consistent plant-based eating spares a meaningful number of animals; quitting forfeits all of it to avoid feeling like a hypocrite for an afternoon.

The slip itself is predictable, not damning. Cravings are conditioned habits that fade with time, and a lapse early on is the habit reasserting itself rather than your character (PubMed, 2018). The fix is dull and effective: notice it, shrug, make the next meal vegan.

Nobody who eats meat seven days a week worries they’ve “blown it” by eating a salad. Apply the same arithmetic to yourself. The only attempt that truly fails is the one you abandon over a single mistake.

Sources

  1. Animal Charity Evaluators / EA Forum, estimates of animals spared per person per year
  2. PubMed, Food cravings and body weight: a conditioning response (2018)